Narratives for Multi-party Mechanisms and Concerns (bibtex)
by Robert Hirschfeld, Tobias Durschmid, Patrick Rein, Marcel Taeumel and Hidehiko Masuhara
Abstract:
Cross-cutting concerns are an inherent property of the implementation of non-trivial software systems. Their study led to the development of advanced modularity constructs, usually supported by meta-level frameworks and programming language constructs, to improve comprehensibility. Because of their invasive nature, systems need to be refactored or rewritten to take advantage of these constructs. However, practical considerations such as organizational or economical constraints often do not allow for such reengineering efforts, leaving those systems without explicit representations of their cross-cutting concerns. We propose a lightweight, non-invasive approach to explicate and document cross-cutting, multi-party concerns called Crosscutting Commentary, or Commentary for short. Our proposal is based on the observation that comments are co-located with the individual semantic units they are about and with that scattered and tangled in the absence of advanced modularity constructs for crosscutting concerns and the assumption that well-crafted, informal explanations of system properties (their intents and the mechanisms they provide) improve comprehensibility. Commentaries are to help communicate narratives about system properties that involve multiple participants, both co-located in a single module or crosscutting several of them, and allow for navigating to, from, and between them to explore the implementation artifacts involved. Commentary was inspired by layers introduced with Context-oriented Programming to associate and manage partial definitions of system elements. While layers contribute to system comprehension during development and software composition at run-time, Commentary focuses on narratives for system exploration. We present our first attempt to provide Commentaries in Squeak/Smalltalk. We explain implementation details and discuss several application scenarios considering the documentation of basic mechanisms of this programming and runtime environment.
Reference:
Narratives for Multi-party Mechanisms and Concerns (Robert Hirschfeld, Tobias Durschmid, Patrick Rein, Marcel Taeumel and Hidehiko Masuhara), In Proceedings of the 35th JSSST Annual Conference (Akimasa Morihata, ed.), 2018.
Bibtex Entry:
@inproceedings{hirschfeld2018jssst,
  organization = {{J}apan Society for Software Science and Technology
		  ({JSSST})},
  month = aug,
  location = {Osaka University, Osaka, Japan},
  editor = {Akimasa Morihata},
  year = 2018,
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 35th JSSST Annual Conference},
  author = {Robert Hirschfeld and Tobias Durschmid and Patrick Rein and Marcel Taeumel and Hidehiko Masuhara},
  pdf = {jssst2018.pdf},
  title = {Narratives for Multi-party Mechanisms and Concerns},
  pages = {No.~5-S},
  date = {2018-08-29},
  keywords = {Smalltalk},
  review = {false},
  abstract = {Cross-cutting concerns are an inherent property of the implementation of non-trivial software systems. Their study led to the development of advanced modularity constructs, usually supported by meta-level frameworks and programming language constructs, to improve comprehensibility. Because of their invasive nature, systems need to be refactored or rewritten to take advantage of these constructs. However, practical considerations such as organizational or economical constraints often do not allow for such reengineering efforts, leaving those systems without explicit representations of their cross-cutting concerns. We propose a lightweight, non-invasive approach to explicate and document cross-cutting, multi-party concerns called Crosscutting Commentary, or Commentary for short. Our proposal is based on the observation that comments are co-located with the individual semantic units they are about and with that scattered and tangled in the absence of advanced modularity constructs for crosscutting concerns and the assumption that well-crafted, informal explanations of system properties (their intents and the mechanisms they provide) improve comprehensibility. Commentaries are to help communicate narratives about system properties that involve multiple participants, both co-located in a single module or crosscutting several of them, and allow for navigating to, from, and between them to explore the implementation artifacts involved. Commentary was inspired by layers introduced with Context-oriented Programming to associate and manage partial definitions of system elements. While layers contribute to system comprehension during development and software composition at run-time, Commentary focuses on narratives for system exploration. We present our first attempt to provide Commentaries in Squeak/Smalltalk. We explain implementation details and discuss several application scenarios considering the documentation of basic mechanisms of this programming and runtime environment.}
}
Powered by bibtexbrowser